Hybrid Work Is Not the Problem — Poor Leadership Is

< Back to all resources
Flexibility at work
Leadership and management
Purpose-driven hybrid
Return to office
Workplace

Brian Elliott along with Standford's Nick Bloom and London School of Economic's Prothwiraj (Raj) Choudhury argue that hybrid work failure stems from poor leadership, not the work model itself. CEOs often return from peer gatherings fixated on return-to-office mandates, treating hybrid work as a policy problem rather than a leadership challenge. Research shows hybrid work actually improves productivity, reduces attrition, and increases engagement when implemented well. The compliance gap between mandated office days and actual attendance signals that managers prioritize results over rule-following. Successful organizations share four capabilities: understanding their talent advantage, measuring results instead of presence, empowering teams to set their own collaboration patterns, and investing in infrastructure, resources, and skill development. Companies like Atlassian, Airbnb, and Allstate demonstrate that flexible work succeeds when aligned with business strategy and team needs, not uniform policies

  • Research on hybrid and remote work
  • Case studies on workplace flexibility
  • Gendered impact of return to office
  • Leadership
  • Psychological impact of mandates

Download this free asset!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Related content

The Real Reason Hybrid, AI, and Change Initiatives Keep Failing (with Brian Elliott)

Leadership and management
,
Flexibility at work
,
Generative AI
,
Technology Adoption
,
Podcast

The State of Work: Lessons from 2025 and What Comes Next

Generative AI
,
Leadership and management
,
Culture at work
,
Podcast

Forced RTO: Surprising Lessons from Newest Data

Flexibility at work
,
Leadership and management
,
Purpose-driven hybrid
,
Return to office
,
Technology Adoption
,
Video